This article was first published by the Conversation (opens in a new tab). Read the original article here (opens in a new tab).


Climate change (opens in a new tab) is underway, and human activities such as urbanisation, industrialisation and food production are key contributors.

Food production alone accounts for around 25% of global carbon emissions (opens in a new tab). Ironically, the changing weather patterns and more frequent extreme weather events resulting from climate change also put the world’s food supplies at risk.

Food production drives deforestation (opens in a new tab), meaning there are fewer trees to absorb carbon dioxide, which contributes to the greenhouse effect (opens in a new tab). What’s more, the fertilisers and pesticides used to protect crops have caused a dramatic decline in insect populations (opens in a new tab), and in soil fertility (opens in a new tab), by affecting the microbial organisms that enrich the soil and enable plants to gain nutrients.

Although, according to the FAO, there are 821m people globally suffering from hunger, the world produces 50% more food than is needed to feed the global population

At the same time, the world population is rising and there are expected to be more than 9.5 billion people (opens in a new tab) on Earth by 2050. In response to these projections, the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) is campaigning for a 60% increase (opens in a new tab) in food production by 2050, by intensifying agriculture (opens in a new tab) to be more productive and use fewer resources, all without increasing the amount of farm land.

It’s not yet clear exactly how this “intensification” should happen. Alternative methods, such as organic farming, are respectful of soil ecology and insect life and can restore soil fertility. But they cannot, at present, produce as much food as industrial agriculture.

Yet the idea that we need more food is debatable. Although, according to the FAO, there are 821m people globally suffering from hunger (opens in a new tab), the world produces 50% more food than is needed to feed the global population (opens in a new tab). Another estimate from biologist and author Colin Tudge suggests that the current food production can feed as many as 14 billion people (opens in a new tab). But one third of this food is wasted (opens in a new tab) because of distorted supply systems, unjust food distribution and unhealthy and unsustainable diets.

So, the efforts of experts in the food sector should not concentrate on agriculture intensification, but rather on strategies to change patterns of consumption and waste at a local and global level. My own research on urban agriculture (opens in a new tab) and sustainable cities (opens in a new tab) suggests there are three main areas where effective changes can be made.

1. Recycling food waste

Food consumption needs to become “circular (opens in a new tab)”. This means that organic waste such as food scraps does not go to landfill, but is instead transformed into compost (which will be needed in a transition to organic agriculture) and biogas.

At present, organic waste is only recycled to a small extent, with some countries such as Germany and the Netherlands leading, while others including Italy and Belgium lag behind (opens in a new tab). But there are new technologies emerging to make this process easier.

For example, the Local Energy Adventure Partnership (opens in a new tab) (LEAP) has created an anaerobic digester designed for an urban context: this machine can transform organic waste from residential or commercial buildings into compost and biogas that can fuel urban food growing.

Some experts (opens in a new tab) also suggest that some food waste – if treated properly – could be used as animal fodder: a practice currently forbidden on hygiene grounds. If reinstated, this measure could reduce the environmental impact of grain cultivation, as less is grown to feed livestock.

2. Urban farming

Another option is to decrease demand for agricultural land by growing food in cities, where more people need it, thereby reducing the distances food has to travel. This would also allow producers to map and match consumers’ demand more effectively, by producing close to the places where food is consumed.

More effective policies for food justice and sovereignty can establish fairer food supply chains and more just distribution of food around the world

There is a lot of research on urban agriculture and how cities can support it, spanning from vertical farms (opens in a new tab) - hydroponic systems enabling cultivation on vertical surfaces - to principles for planning cities that facilitate the use of land, rooftops and other spaces to grow food into a continuous green infrastructure (opens in a new tab).

In this area, too, it’s possible to find innovations designed to make urban farming easier and more sustainable. For example, The Farmhouse (opens in a new tab) is a modular housing system suitable for vertical stacking that enables all residents to grow food. And Blockchain Domes (opens in a new tab) is a patented system that uses excess heat from computer servers to provide optimal thermal conditions for greenhouses in colder climates.

3. Changing diets

The third option is to encourage people to change their diets. Growing middle-income groups in developing countries are consuming ever higher quantities of meat, cheese and eggs. In China, since 1990, consumption of beef and poultry has quadrupled (opens in a new tab). But the diet of farmed animals is heavy in grains, which instead could be used to feed people more efficiently (opens in a new tab). Also, cattle farming requires vast quantities of water and grassland, sometimes obtained through deforestation (opens in a new tab).

Getting people to eat less meat (opens in a new tab) will help to ease the pressure on the world’s food system. In cities, governments, research institutions, communities and businesses can collaborate (opens in a new tab) on food initiatives to give people healthier, cheaper and more sustainable choices – but this requires political will and organisation between different levels of government.

Clearly, each of these approaches has a limited scope of action, compared to agricultural techniques or strategies which can be deployed at an industrial level. But with so many promising proposals, there can be a many-pronged approach that makes efficient use of the existing resources in cities, while also changing consumers’ habits. Together with these three changes, more effective policies for food justice and sovereignty can establish fairer food supply chains and more just distribution of food around the world. —Silvio Caputo

We want to hear what you think about this article. Pitch an article (opens in a new tab) to us or send your comments to hello@apolitical.co

(Picture credit: Unsplash)


Make sure to share your own thoughts with the author by leaving a comment below