Fifty years of armed civil conflict in Colombia left more than 200,000 (opens in a new tab) people dead and created the world’s largest (opens in a new tab) displaced population after Syria, with six million (opens in a new tab) forced from their homes and land.

As in many armed conflicts around the world, in Colombia, men and women did not have the same experiences of violence. “The armed conflict has had a disproportionate impact on women,” said Germán Espejo, a Colombian government representative at a recent conference (opens in a new tab) in London.

While more men were killed (opens in a new tab) in the conflict, women and girls were more likely (opens in a new tab) to suffer sexual violence, rape, enslavement and forced labour, prostitution and abortions. A recent Oxfam survey (opens in a new tab) found that between 2010 and 2015, 400 Colombian women a day suffered gender-based violence.

"The armed conflict has had a disproportionate impact on women"

58% of the (opens in a new tab) internally displaced population is also female, creating particular vulnerabilities for rural women, who often lack official land titles, and for indigenous women for whom land is central to culture and spirituality.

“Women are particularly vulnerable in the context of return to land because it’s hard for them to prove ownership. Often those women who are murdered or threatened are leaders of the land restitution process,” said July Farjado, a research coordinator at Humanas (opens in a new tab), an organisation that promotes human rights.

Despite the well-known gender differential impacts of violence, in 31 peace processes around the world over the last 20 years (opens in a new tab), women have made up only 2% of chief mediators and 9% of negotiators. Yet, peace agreements involving women are in fact more likely to last longer (35% more likely to last at least 15 years (opens in a new tab)).

Innovations in female participation

The 2016 peace agreement between the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces (FARC) opened a door for a new, less violent future for the country, an achievement for which President Juan Manuel Santos won a Nobel Peace Prize (opens in a new tab).

Less well known, however, is the groundbreaking inclusion of both women and LGBTQ groups in the peace process, making the final accord by far the most inclusive (opens in a new tab) in history.

Formal peace talks opened for the first time in Cuba in 2012, and at that point just one of the 20 (opens in a new tab) negotiators was female. But a national summit (opens in a new tab) on women’s participation organised by civil society leaders changed everything, bringing together hundreds of representatives from women’s organisations from all over Colombia to force gender onto the table. By 2015, women made up (opens in a new tab) 20% of the government negotiating team and 43% of FARC delegates.

"The subcommission was unique of its kind in peace processes around world"

The most innovative institutional mechanism for including women was the gender sub-commission (opens in a new tab), an official bipartisan group formed in 2014 of between five and six delegates from each party. “It was [the first] of its kind in peace processes around the world. It had the mandate to ensure the peace agreements made had adequate gender focus,” said Espejo.

The subcommission’s main purpose (opens in a new tab) was to review all the peace documents from a gender perspective, including the agreements (opens in a new tab) that had already been reached on rural development, political participation and resolving the drugs problem.

Critically, it also invited several delegations of women and LGBTQ people affected by the conflict to come to the formal talks in Havana and meet the negotiators. Former female fighters, women farmers, indigenous women, and sexual violence survivors and experts were all called on (opens in a new tab) to put forward their views. This process was unprecedented (opens in a new tab): the government and FARC panels received 60 testimonies and recommendations from conflict and sexual violence survivors, including 36 women.

Another - perhaps unexpected - group invited to Havana in 2016 were former female fighters from countries including Indonesia, Guatemala, Northern Ireland, and South Africa. These women spoke about the challenges of their reintegration into civilian life, with men often expecting them to return to more traditional roles. They gave the subcommission advice on possible programs (opens in a new tab), urging the importance of education, jobs, and psychosocial support.

“We are coming from insurgent groups – for 25 years I was in the mountains"

“We are coming from insurgent groups – for 25 years I was in the mountains – and it was essential to learn best practices from women in other countries,” Victoria Sandino, the FARC Negotiating Team member responsible for gender, said at the conference. “For us, it was very important for there to be a dignified process of reincorporation of women into civilian life. Now we have created a strategy: better political participation, economic empowerment, social guarantees, and safety guarantees.”

The impact

The involvement of so many women has had innumerable impacts on the peace process. The final agreement has an entire chapter (opens in a new tab) devoted to gender – the first of its kind – and every time (opens in a new tab) the word “men” is mentioned it’s followed by “and women.”

Many sections are sensitive women’s needs, such as that around land and rural issues. (opens in a new tab) The document now explicitly (opens in a new tab) refers to women’s right to own land, says women should get preference in the distribution of land through the land fund, and that women should have priority access to subsidies and credits.

The accord also states that there will be no amnesty (opens in a new tab) for crimes of sexual violence, and a special unit will soon be set up (opens in a new tab) to investigate conflict-related sexual violence. There are also special provisions for women’s political participation.

Looking to the future

The peace process and agreement so far have been highly innovative and inclusive, but perhaps the gravest challenge (opens in a new tab) is still to come – in implementation. There have already been implementation delays (opens in a new tab), and, with elections in 2018, Santos’ government needs to show results (opens in a new tab), fast.

**“**The gender focus will face long-term challenges"

While the conflict is formally over, other illegal armed groups are filling the vacuum (opens in a new tab) left by the FARC, and insecurity is even increasing: since 2016, more than 200 (opens in a new tab) civil society leaders have been killed. Forced displacement and illegal land grabs also continue (opens in a new tab).

"The gender focus will face long-term challenges," said Espejo. "But it's important to remember that the implementation of the agreement in all its components is not an exclusive task of the government and FARC – it involves the active participation and commitment of local government, civil society, and the international community.”

(Picture credit: Flickr/USAID)

Odette Chalaby
odette.chalaby@apolitical.co


Make sure to share your own thoughts with the author by leaving a comment below