Search across all content
Legal
Contact
Platform
Community
The project developed a high-precision GPT model using a curated dataset of 286 Q&A pairs
The diversification of library services and expansion of data have made it difficult for users to obtain desired information immediately, and people have faced limitations in addressing this. Therefore, this project aims to utilize generative AI to learn library data and provides a service that allows users to easily find the information they seek.
The project utilized a PDF Annotation Tool to extract Q&A sets, followed by data preprocessing and a rigorous review of labeled data for model training. This training incorporated 286 items from the National Library of Korea, including FAQs, user guides, procedure manuals, and promotional materials. To optimize performance, the system trained a retrieval engine on MaumGPT (13B parameters) and implemented two conventional search engines for comparative analysis. Ultimately, the service developed a GPT-based chatbot designed to provide precise answers by leveraging website FAQs and documents from the National Knowledge Resource Sharing Service.
The project developed a high-precision GPT model using a curated dataset of 286 Q&A pairs. Comparative analysis results are as follows:
The system enhances user convenience by effectively translating general inquiries into structured library service information.
Launch year: 2023
Case study courtesy of the National Information Society Agency, Republic of Korea, Apolitical's Content Partner. Sourced from Use Cases of Public AI Service, Vol.2, https://eng.nia.or.kr/site/nia_eng/ex/bbs/View.do?cbIdx=31975&bcIdx=29182&parentSeq=29184
In partnership with
National Information Society Agency (NIA)
In partnership with
National Information Society Agency (NIA)





Connect with 500,000+ public servants solving your hardest challenges.





Connect with 500,000+ public servants solving your hardest challenges.
Help public servants worldwide learn from your work, what worked, what flopped and what you'd do differently

Log in or sign up to continue the conversation